On Preferring and Inspecting Abductive Models
نویسندگان
چکیده
This work proposes the application of preferences over abductive logic programs as an appealing declarative formalism to model choice situations. In particular, both a priori and a posteriori handling of preferences between abductive extensions of a theory are addressed as complementary and essential mechanisms in a broader framework for abductive reasoning. Furthermore, both of these choice mechanisms are combined with other formalisms for decision making, like economic decision theory, resulting in theories containing the best advantages from both qualitative and quantitative formalisms. Several examples are presented throughout to illustrate the enounced methodologies. These have been tested in our implementation, which we explain in detail.
منابع مشابه
Preferring maximum confirmation diagnoses
Models used for Model-Based Diagnosis usually assume that the inaccuracy of data is smaller than the precision with which the data is described. In some domains, however, this assumption is invalid. Observations may not be accurate or the behavior model of the system does not allow for accurate predictions. Therefore, the accuracy of predictions, which is a function of the accuracy of the obser...
متن کاملInspecting Side-Effects of Abduction in Logic Programs
In the context of abduction in Logic Programs, when finding an abductive solution for a query, one may want to check too whether some other literals become true (or false) as a consequence, strictly within the abductive solution found, that is without performing additional abductions, and without having to produce a complete model to do so. That is, such consequence literals may consume, but no...
متن کاملPreferring and Updating in Abductive Multi-agent Systems
We present a logical framework and the declarative semantics of a multi-agent system in which each agent can communicate with and update other agents, can react to the environment, is able to prefer, whether beliefs or reactions, when several alternatives are possible, and is able to abduce hypotheses to explain observations. The knowledge state of an agent is represented by an updatable priori...
متن کاملMaintaining Sequences of Knowledge Bases in ASP
Updates of knowledge bases have become an important topic in Artificial Intelligence and a key problem in knowledge representation and reasoning. One of the latest ideas to update logic programs is choosing between models of generalised answer sets to overcome disadvantages of previous approaches. This paper is an extended proposal of a semantics for updates that performs the methods presented ...
متن کاملAbductive reasoning through filtering
Abduction is an inference mechanism where given a knowledge base and some observations , the reasoner tries to nd hypotheses which together with the knowledge base explain the observations. A reasoning based on such an inference mechanism is referred to as abductive reasoning. Given a theory and some observations, by l-tering the theory with the observations, we mean selecting only those models...
متن کامل